|
|
|
Chapter
Two
“Disturbing national statistics paint an overall picture of
adolescence as ‘the fall’ for girls. . .”
Dr. Barrie Thorne, Gender Play
[1]
I dropped by my former school not long ago for a teachers’ luncheon and
ran into Carolyn P. passing through the office with a soup spoon in
her hand. She’s one of those indefatigable
parent volunteers who keep our schools functioning, and both her children have
been in my gifted program. Mark was the quintessential divergent boy, bright,
verbal, and creative, but also immature and underachieving in his schoolwork.
From what I’d heard, his work habits had caught up to him in junior high,
and he’d sunk like a stone. Anne is as bright and competent a fifth-grader
as you’ll find, with some of the highest test scores I’ve seen in awhile.
I deliberately avoided any mention of Mark: the last time Carolyn and I had
talked she had been asked to shadow him through his school day to see what the
teachers were up against. That was six months ago.
But she brought him up. “Mark’s
turned it around this spring,” she grinned. “He’s doing great!”
“Well, tell him I said
hello. I always thought . . . ”
“But I don’t know what
to do about Anne. She turned 11!”
By the look on her face, you’d have thought that Anne had been arrested for
drugs.
Anne? She had seemed just
fine the last time I saw her. Carolyn turned towards the teachers’ room
where she was setting up the luncheon. “Gawd!”
she blurted as the door swung open. “The things she says! I asked my mother
if I ever talked to her like that. ‘You bet!’ she said.”
“Carolyn,” I tried. “There’s a couple books you probably should
read.”
“Books?” She looked like I was suggesting dirty pictures. “I don’t
want to read about this. I just want
to get it over with.” She waved the spoon like a wand and headed through the
door. “Gotta go. . . .”
“Carolyn!” I tried. “Give me a call sometime and . . . .” Nothing but door.
Carol Gilligan of the Harvard Project on Women’s Psychology and Girls’
Development describes this experience as “hitting the wall” of a
consumerist, male-centered, male-voiced Western culture which has been
grounded for millennia in the secondary status of its females. The messages
are abundant and mostly subliminal, so embedded in the culture that they pass
almost unnoticed: the scarcity of notable women included in school history
texts, for instance, or the routine public disrobing of the female body to
sell consumer products. They may start to notice how the “male energy” in
their classrooms often monopolizes their teachers’ attention. The growing
awareness of their physical vulnerability may become conscious, as images of
women and girls under physical assault pass as routine plot points on the TV
or in the movies they watch, where rape, assault, and abduction appear as
often as Pepsi commercials. So abundant is the news of their inferior status,
so normalized, that it reaches girls (and the rest of us) not as images at
all, but as reality itself. Force
Fields
Cultural myths – The
messages of women’s inferiority are deeply embedded in our cultural legacy.
They underlie the fairy tales girls are raised on, where men boldly go forth,
while the females watch, swoon, await the princely kiss that will bring them
to life. They are draped from the
wall of their fifth grade classroom, with the poster of the all-male
pantheon of U.S. presidents reminding them at every glance just which
gender has led their country to greatness. The history they learn is
essentially a history of the achievements of white males. Men, they learn,
have always held an overwhelming disproportion of power and influence in the
world. It has been men, and not women, who have founded the empires, fought
the battles, made the laws, invented the machines, walked on the moon,
produced the science, written the classics – men, the message insists from
just about everywhere that count, not women.
Institutional biases – Men
still account for the lion’s share of what’s important, if you count the
number of suits that dominate the major news stories of press conferences,
inaugurations, treaty signings and corporate mergers. Even with twenty-five
years of Title IX, even with the surge of gender awareness of the past decade,
even with the fast-track promotions of women into higher and higher places of
influence, almost ninety percent of
the people quoted in front-page stories of daily newspapers are men.
[3]
Girls learn that women do not have as much earning power as men, and
come to grasp that they will live with less power and influence than
their male friends. Women still account for fewer than one percent of the CEOs
of the Fortune 1000 corporations (three at last count), and they represent
less than ten percent of the U.S. Congress. Men apparently will be running
things for some time to come, if the 1996 presidential elections were any
indication: of the ten presidential candidates (nine Republicans, one
Democrat) all were male.
Young adolescent girls can’t help noticing that the media they watch
is still predominantly male-centered, since male characters still outnumber
females on network TV by three-to-one. All the anchors for the three major
network news programs (Peter Jennings, Tom Brokaw, Dan Rather) are men, and
men narrate virtually all of the commercials, and play the protagonists of
most of the dramas and comedies. The message is unmistakable: men are more
important, more powerful, more knowledgeable, more present
– and eleven-year-olds start to
get it. A recent survey asked girls to name their ten favorite television
personalities and the average list included eight males. Boys get the message
too – when asked the same question, they listed no women at all.
Personal experience –
A girl’s own experience of the culture’s tilting towards males reinforces
its messages and forms a kind of mortar that seals the wall of
bias in place. She may have experienced gender bias all along. But only
now, with her powers of perception heightened by a spurt of brain growth as
she nears adolescence, do her experiences resonate sharply enough with
cultural messages to actually rattle her self-confidence. It may happen when
she notices for the first time that her softball field lacks the bleachers,
the refreshment stands or even the bathrooms
so copiously lavished on the nearby Little League diamond where her brother
plays.
[5]
Messages of her secondary status are reinforced in the playground
patter that envelops her daily consciousness – “You
throw like a girl!” (Just
last week, a well-meaning
Little League coach told an AAUW friend of mine that her nine-year-old
son swung a bat “like a girl.” But the coach told her not to worry, he’d
“straightened him out.”) She sees reinforcement in the unconscious
deference of the female teachers in her school to the males, or her mother to
her father. (A young woman in one of my classes on teaching schoolgirls
remembered that every time a male walked into her house while she was talking
with her mother, the mother turned toward him and ignored her.)
So subtle is the process of this devaluation, so pervasive and
historically embedded, that girls (and women) barely detect what is happening
to them. The message is virtually transparent when it reaches them, like a
friendly breeze heavy with invisible, but toxic, fumes. Only as women (and by
no means all of them) do they come to suspect the enormity of the cultural
enterprise that fixes their place and thinking in a subordinate position to
their male friends and brothers. “Almost every woman I know has her own
recollection of when the truth hit and the anger began to stir,” Joan Ryan,
a sports columnist, writes of her own experience:
“For one, it came when she couldn't follow her brothers on to the
Little League field, for another, when she once asked why she was stuck inside
the house setting the table while her father and brothers shot baskets in the
driveway. ‘Now don't go complaining,’ her mother intoned. Even as our
anger stirred it remained largely unspoken.
[7]
“ Getting
the Message
Even more turbulence awaits girls around the age of eleven, as they
begin to experience the profound physical changes of puberty. Where adolescent
boys get bigger and stronger, girls change
shape. Almost overnight, their bodies take on the outlines of adult women,
and with them, the objectification and sexualization that accompanies being an
adult female in a male-centered culture. Such abrupt and visible alterations
in their bodies wrench them from the world of their childhood in ways that
they view far more negatively than do pubescent boys.
[11]
Also for the first time, girls begin to see themselves as they imagine
that others see them, and begin to judge themselves through the lens of what
scholars call the male gaze. They are now judged by boys on the basis of their
physical appearance, often reduced to specific body parts. Boys gain a source
of social power that girls do not enjoy, the authority to judge girls’
physical looks. Girls now depend far more on boys’ good opinions of their
physical attractiveness than boys depend upon girls.’ Boys can rely on their
athletic or academic achievements for status in ways that girls simply cannot.
Believing that they have little choice, many young adolescent girls learn to
trade on their attractiveness. The antic, freewheeling nine-year-old who didn’t
care if she talked too loud now may become fixated on how thin she is.
The manner in which these changes influence self-image also differ by
gender. Polls and surveys of adolescents’ attitudes show that both boys and
girls look at the changes that boys go through as positive. Girls, however,
see the changes that they experience in adolescence as negative.
[13]
Increasingly on the lookout to please others, they may shape their
actions and their feelings about themselves increasingly around what others
presume they should be.
Adolescent boys and girls understand, if adults have forgotten, that
the adolescent experience is markedly different for boys and girls, and that
the overall experience, with some exceptions, favors boys. When young
adolescents are asked whether advantages lie in being male or female in today’s
culture, boys win hands down. One recent study of 2000 middle-school students
in five states asked them to describe the best thing about their gender.
[17]
Both girls and boys in the survey agreed that boys can do
more and are viewed as better, while the boys’ responses regarding their
advantages fell into two categories: “We can do more things,” and, “Not
being a girl.” “Boys clearly saw themselves as able to do more, to be more
active in sports, have more fun and more opportunities,” while the most
common responses of the girls when asked the best thing about their gender
were distressing: “I don’t know.” “Can’t think of any.” Girls’ Losses
So much depends upon our sense of self-worth – the friends we seek
out, the courses we take, the careers we plan, the dreams we dare to have. So
it shouldn’t come as a surprise to find that many studies find measurable
declines among girls around the age of eleven in several significant areas of
self-concept, health, and performance. These include: °
Lowered Self-esteem – Girls’ self-confidence begins to drop in early adolescence at two to
three times the rate for boys. Psychological
research has long found that adolescent girls’ self-esteem was at greater
risk than that of boys the same age. In 1991, the American Association of
University Women published a poll of 3000 boys and girls that documented that
loss and brought it to the attention of the national media. The steepest drop
in self confidence occurred around the age of eleven, during the middle-school
years.
[19]
Echoing Gilligan and
Brown, the report concluded: "Girls aged eight and nine are confident,
assertive and feel authoritative about themselves. They emerge from
adolescence with a poor self-image, constrained views of their future and
their place in society, and much less confidence about themselves and their
abilities."
[20]
The poll received enormous media attention and stirred controversy
because it challenged the notion that twenty-five years of
a women’s movement had made the culture a safe and healthy
environment for girls to grow up in. A
more recent twenty-year study at the °
Lower Emotional Resilience – Girls begin to experience increased emotional problems at the
beginning of adolescence. The emotional hardiness of nine-and ten-year-old
girls is one of the more lamentable casualties of their collision with the
wall. Mary Pipher points out that she rarely sees preadolescent girls in her
practice and those who do appear come because of specific abuses or
deprivations, like divorce, physical abuse, or the death of a parent. And even
under such harrowing circumstances these girls still displayed a surprising
courage and resilience. “It’s amazing,” she observes, “how little help
these girls needed from me to heal and move on.”
[24]
It isn’t until after girls reach adolescence that their emotional
stability gives way to the onset of stress-related disorders. Just in the past
few years, Pipher found her own practice becoming filled with “girls with
eating disorders, alcohol problems, post-traumatic stress reactions to sexual
or physical assaults, sexually transmitted diseases, self-inflicted injuries
and strange phobias, and girls who have tried to kill themselves or run away.”
[25]
Girls seem especially prone to the pressures of early adolescence.
Before puberty, for instance, boys and girls are equally likely to report that
they are depressed. But as they move into their teens, twice as many girls
report symptoms of depression as do teenage boys.
[26]
High school girls are
also diagnosed much more often than teenage boys as being clinically
depressed.
[27]
More chilling, one out of
four adolescent girls attempts suicide.
[28]
This is four to five times the rate of boys, although more boys,
who choose more lethal methods, actually kill themselves.
[29]
Pipher cites a health department survey which showed that forty percent of all the
girls in her Midwest metropolitan area had considered suicide during the
previous year. ° Reduced
Sports Participation – During the onset of adolescence, girls drop out
of team sports at six times the rate of boys. °Adult
Underachievement – Gifted women do not achieve as highly in the
workplace as do gifted men even though girls and women perform better
throughout their schooling. Self-doubt is cited as one of the primary reasons
for their underachievement.
[30]
A brief glance at “Professional
Women at the Millenium” on pages 136 and 137 make it clear that the full and
equitable use of women’s talents in our society remains a long way off.
After almost two decades studying the lives and careers of high-achieving
professional women, Dr. Sally M. Reis of the
Few questions can be raised about whether or not the underachievement
of bright women exists; the fact remains that in almost all professional
fields and occupations, men overwhelmingly surpass women in both the
professional accomplishments they achieve and the financial benefits they
reap.
[31]
Chapter
Two – The Fall
[1]
[2]
Emily Hancock, 1989, 39.
[3]
“Get a Job,” Take Our Daughters to
Work, Ms. Foundation for Women, 1994.
[4]
Nancy Ramsey, quoted in “Where Women Are Going,” Independent Journal,
[5]
I was a Little League father for four years yet it never occurred to me that
girls played with such inferior facilities until a sixth-grade girls’
group finally pointed it out. It was simply “the way things are.”
[6]
Ibid.,1995, 1.
[7]
Joan Ryan, “Women’s Work is Never Done,” San
Francisco Chronicle,
[8]
Brown
and Gilligan, 1992.
[9]
See, for instance, Linda Riley, “My Worst Nightmare: Wisconsin Students’
Perceptions of Being the Other Gender,” Center for Vocational, Technical,
and Adult Education, University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, WI, 1993;
and, A. Baumgartner-Papageorgiou, “My Daddy Might Have Loved Me: Student
Perceptions of Differences Between Being Male and Being Female,” Institute
for Equality in Education, University of Colorado, 1982. (Available from the
Colorado Department of Education.); Mee, C.S., "Middle School Voices on
Gender Identity," Women's Educational Equity Act Publishing Center
Digest, March 1995, Educational Development Center, Inc., Newton, MA 02158,
1-6; Sadker & Sadker, 1994, 84.
[10]
O'Reilly, Jane,
"The Lost Girls," Mirabella,
April, 1994, 117.
[11]
See, Mee, C.S., "Middle School Voices on Gender Identity," Women's
Educational Equity Act Publishing Center Digest, March 1995, Educational
Development Center, Inc., Newton, MA 02158, 1-6; Peggy Orenstein, 1994, 297;
Greenberg-Lake, “Shortchanging Girls, Shortchanging America,”
AAUW, 1991, 7.
[12]
Peggy Orenstein, 1994, xxvii.
[13]
See Susan Harter, “Self and Identity Development,” in At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent, Shirley Feldman and
Glen Elliot, eds. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990, 365;
Mee, C.S., 1995, l; Peggy
Orenstein, 1994, 297; Greenberg-Lake,
“Shortchanging Girls, Shortchanging America,”
AAUW, 1991, 7.
[14]
Dr.
Annie Rogers, 1993, 289.
[15]
Lyn Brown, 1993, 12.
[16]
Nicky Marone, 33.
[17]
Mee, C.S., "Middle School Voices on Gender Identity," Women's
Educational Equity Act Publishing Center Digest, March 1995, Educational
Development Center, Inc., Newton, MA 02158, 1-6.
[18]
Ibid.,
1-6.
[19]
Greenberg-Lake, “Shortchanging Girls, Shortchanging
[20]
Greenberg-Lake, “Shortchanging Girls, Shortchanging
[21]
Jack
Block and Richard Robins, “A Longitudinal Study of Consistency and Change
in Self-esteem from early adolescence to early adulthood,” Child
Development, June 1993, V. 64, 909-922. “Our longitudinal finding that
boys tend to increase and girls to decrease in self-esteem during
adolescence is consistent with cross-sectional research showing that there
are more girls than boys with low self-esteem in early adolescence and that
this difference grows larger by later adolescence.”
[22]
Linda Feltes, et.al., Creating Gender
Equity: Moving from Awareness to Action, The Upper Midwest Women’s
[23]
Peggy Orenstein, 1994, 93. She cites figures from a
[24]
Mary Pipher, 1994, 18. Pipher specifically mentions Coreen, who was
physically abused, Anna, whose parents were divorced, and Brenda, whose
father killed himself. Brenda: “If my father didn’t want to stick
around, that’s his loss.” The other two girls were angry, not at
themselves, though, but at the adults who they thought were making mistakes.
[25]
Mary Pipher, 1994, 27.
[26]
Dr. Daniel S. Pine, in Susan Gilbert, “Emotional Ills Tied to Stunted
Growth in Girls,”
[27]
Sundra Flansburg, 1991, 3. “Girls tend to increase in depressive affect
during adolescence, so that by late adolescence they exhibit more depressive
affect than boys.” Also, Jack Block and Richard Robins, “A Longitudinal
Study of Consistency and Change in Self-Esteem from early adolescence to
early adulthood,” Child Development, June 1993, V. 64, 920.
[28]
Christine Renne Robinson, “Working with Adolescent Girls: Strategies to
Address Health Status,” Women, Girls and Psychotherapy, ed., Carol Gilligan, et. al, , pp.
241-252, in
[29]
AAUW Educational Foundation, 1992, 3
[30]
K.D. Noble, “Counseling gifted women: Becoming the heroes of our own
stories. Journal for the Education of
the Gifted, 12(2), 131-141, in “A Developmental Investigation of the
Lives of Gifted Women,” Gifted Child
Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 4, Fall 1992, 202.
[31]
Sally Reis, “We can’t change what we don’t recognize: Understanding
the special needs of gifted females,” Gifted
Child Quarterly, 31:2, Spring 1987, 83.
|